Landscape Architecture as Necessity
June 10, 2016
Kelly Shannon, PhD
Professor of Architecture and Director of the Graduate Program of Landscape Architecture + Urbanism
University of Southern California
This presentation was part of the Landscape Architecture Foundation’s The New Landscape Declaration: A Summit on Landscape Architecture and the Future held in Philadelphia on June 10-11, 2016. Each of the 25 invited speakers was asked to write a 1,000-word “Declaration” of leadership and ideas for how landscape architecture can make its vital contribution in response to the challenges of our time and the next 50 years. These Declarations were then presented at the Summit.
Landscape Architecture as Necessity
In 1966, the authors of LAF’s Declaration of Concern claimed they were brought together by a highly disturbing environmental crisis. They issued a call to arms for the profession of landscape architecture. Fifty years later, in a world that is increasingly divided, landscape architecture arguably remains the most powerful tool to marry social and ecological justice.
Landscape architecture has the capacity to address the most pressing and fundamental problems facing the world today: climate change, water and food security, afforestation, infrastructure, energy, and unchecked urbanization. An entire new array of challenging programs and projects await the landscape architect. Moreover, in addition to beauty and function, there is persuasive political agency of well-designed territories that intelligently work across scales and ecologies.
Landscape architecture involves systemic thinking, concerned with ecologies of dynamic change, with adaptability, resilience, and flexibility, while at the same time giving the necessary attention for the concrete and its materiality. Today we live in remarkably turbulent and critical times that require radical system change: politically, socio-culturally, economically, and spatially. Status quo is quite simply unsustainable. For humanity. For planet earth. For future generations of both.
We are now at a precipice, a critical tipping point, standing before the wholesale destruction of the planet. The never-ending, interlinked and adaptive cycles of growth, accumulation, restructuring, and renewal occur in human and natural ecologies of nested sets of scales and timeframes. Landscape architecture must become the essential game changer in terms of not only reshaping the earth’s ecological systems in practice but in transforming the fundamental habitation of the planet through broader systemic thinking.
The world is marching towards catastrophe, and landscape architecture has a responsibility. It must be at the core of a categorical shift. Climate change is not pseudoscience. Compromised summit declarations do not have a forceful impact. Landscape architecture must set the boundaries for policy makers and orient social movements. Bold and inspired projects can lead policy.
The public context in the global north requires careful yet bold re-editing and re-calibrating because the process of development transforms, optimizes, and corrects; the process is not primarily concerned with accommodating massive demographic, social, and economic growth in new urban areas. New hybrid ecologies must create innovative synergies between city and nature, between consumptive and productive space, between impermeable and porous surfaces, and between the urban and the rural.
In the global south, where urbanization, industrialization, and migration gallop ahead, stabilizing natural ecologies must take place simultaneously with massive development. Robust green and blue systems can structure territories and create frames for adaptive landscapes. Resilience must be built into territories and cities by designing an overlap of natural and built ecologies.
Despite the impassioned plea of our colleagues 50 years ago, landscape architects have mostly been peripheral to large environmental agendas; in Western Europe, the field is at its most progressive with landscape architects occasionally leading major urban transformation projects and participating in robust infrastructure projects. The American landscape architect must more pro-actively create larger opportunities for design of the environment beyond the piecemeal and ad hoc, and landscape architects must deepen commitment, the political will, for the continued expansion of the public realm. Clients must be cultivated, and the role of the landscape architect must be properly understood and valued at the national, regional, city, and local levels.
Immense opportunity and obligation await the American landscape architect in particular. Increasing civic discord across the nation’s cities and the effects of recent climate-related extremes like prolonged heat waves, droughts, floods, cyclones, and wildfires reveal the significant vulnerability and exposure of human and natural ecosystems. Taken together, this is a renewed wakeup call, and landscape architecture is urgently needed to create equitable and truly democratic public realms and implement risk mitigation strategies.
At the same time, it is landscape architecture that has the ability, and indeed the responsibility, to ground projects to their specificity: their workings, secrets, logic, opportunities, and inherent dangers. The “green wave” and corresponding “performance-driven” obsessions must not be a panacea. Fieldwork unveils specific geologies and geographies of contexts and the messiness and contested realities of the everyday; investigations into the existing logic of landscapes, cultural appropriations of a territory, social formation and codification of spaces require both diachronic and synchronic perspectives.
On-site, interpretative mapping can go far beyond the descriptive and become a form of critical realism (critical in selecting what to map) and the base for insights through the discovery of unspoken and unwritten realities gained from a haptic and experienced sense. In turn, landscape architecture is the operative instrument for engaged resistance to relentless homogenization, globalization, and “flatting out” of cultures and places. Projects must be contextually embedded, geographically, geologically, and culturally.
Landscape architecture is indeed an ever more urgent necessity. It is simultaneously necessary for landscape architecture to reclaim its position as a key discipline able to uniquely synthesize ecological systems, scientific data, engineering methods, social practices, and cultural values, and integrate them all into the design of the built environment. Bold visions must combine the tangible and the imaginary to provoke conversations that promote social equity and environmental justice as well as manifest landscape’s transformative power. It is time once again to make a strong call to arms to the profession to more actively engage with the world and prove that landscape architecture is a necessity. The political agency of the profession must be forcibly reactivated and the power of landscape architecture engaged to be the game changer in reshaping ecological systems and transforming forms of living.